Stationary‐phase mutation in microbes can produce selected (‘adaptive’) mutants preferentially. In one system, this occurs via a distinct, recombination‐dependent mechanism. Two points of controversy have surrounded these adaptive reversions of an Escherichia coli lac mutation. First, are the mutations directed preferentially to the selected gene in a Lamarckian manner? Second, is the adaptive mutation mechanism specific to the F plasmid replicon carrying lac? We report that lac adaptive mutations are associated with hypermutation in unselected genes, in all replicons in the cell. The associated mutations have a similar sequence spectrum to the adaptive reversions. Thus, the adaptive mutagenesis mechanism is not directed to the lac genes, in a Lamarckian manner, nor to the F′ replicon carrying lac. Hypermutation was not found in non‐revertants exposed to selection. Therefore, the genome‐wide hypermutation underlying adaptive mutation occurs in a differentiated subpopulation. The existence of mutable subpopulations in non‐growing cells is important in bacterial evolution and could be relevant to the somatic mutations that give rise to cancers in multicellular organisms.
‘Adaptive’ mutations are an unexpected kind of spontaneous mutation that are distinguished from normal spontaneous growth‐dependent mutations (e.g. Luria and Delbrück, 1943; Lederberg and Lederberg, 1952) by the criteria that adaptive mutations arise only in the presence of selection for those mutations, and in non‐dividing or slowly growing stationary‐phase cells (e.g. Ryan, 1955; Cairns et al., 1988; Hall, 1990, 1992; Cairns and Foster, 1991; Jayaraman, 1992; Steele and Jinks‐Robertson, 1992; Foster, 1994; reviewed by Drake, 1991; Foster, 1993). Adaptive mutation provoked controversy about whether mutagenesis mechanisms exist that direct mutation preferentially to a selected gene, in a Lamarckian manner (e.g. Cairns et al., 1988; Charlesworth et al., 1988; Cairns, 1993; Lenski and Mittler, 1993a,b). The unorthodoxy of this suggestion led many to argue that adaptive mutation must not exist (reviewed by Foster, 1993; Culotta, 1994). In one experimental system, adaptive mutation has been demonstrated to exist as a process mechanistically distinct from growth‐dependent mutation by the following findings. Adaptive reversion of a lac frameshift mutation carried on an F′ sex plasmid in Escherichia coli (Cairns and Foster, 1991) requires homologous genetic recombination functions (Harris et al., 1994, 1996; Foster et al., 1996), and produces a novel sequence spectrum (Foster and Trimarchi, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1994). Neither of these is seen in growth‐dependent reversions of the same allele. These findings demonstrate a novel mutagenic mechanism for the adaptive lac reversions, which includes genetic recombination and has other unique features (reviewed by Rosenberg, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1995, 1996; and discussed below). However, it has been suggested that this mechanism may represent a peculiarity of sex plasmid biology which would not pertain to mutagenesis in general, and would not operate on replicons other than sex plasmids (Foster and Trimarchi, 1995; Galitski and Roth, 1995; Peters and Benson, 1995; Radicella et al., 1995; and discussed below).
In this report, we address three questions. First, is the mutagenic process that produces recombination‐dependent Lac+ adaptive mutations directed in a Lamarckian manner preferentially to the lac gene? Second, is that mutation mechanism specific to the F′ sex plasmid? Third, we test the postulate of Hall (1990) that adaptive mutants arise from a differentiated subpopulation of all the cells exposed to selection which experiences a (random Darwinian) genome‐wide hypermutable state (also considered by Ninio, 1991; Harris et al., 1994; Rosenberg, 1994). We find first, that the mutational process that generates the Lac+ adaptive reversions is not directed to the lac genes, and second, that it is not specific to the F′ replicon that carries lac. Unselected genes in all replicons in the cell are mutated at a high level in association with Lac adaptive reversion. Third, genome‐wide hypermutation underlying adaptive Lac reversion is found to occur in a subpopulation of cells exposed to selection as suggested (Hall, 1990). These findings bear on the molecular mechanism of recombination‐dependent adaptive mutation and on its evolutionary significance.
Assay for a hypermutable subpopulation
To test the possibility that random, genome‐wide mutation might occur in only a small subpopulation of the cells exposed to selection (Hall, 1990; Ninio, 1991; Harris et al., 1994), a replica‐plating screen was used to score unselected mutations. Unselected mutations were scored amongst Lac+ adaptive revertant colonies and in two control populations (see Materials and methods): the Lac− frameshift‐bearing cells grown into colonies without exposure to selection (Lac− unstressed colonies), and the Lac− frameshift‐bearing cells that were exposed to selection, but which did not mutate to Lac+ (Lac− stressed cell colonies). To obtain Lac+ adaptive revertants and Lac− stressed cells, the lac frameshift‐bearing cells were plated on lactose minimal medium and incubated for 6–7 days as described (Cairns and Foster, 1991; Harris et al., 1994, 1996). Growth‐dependent Lac+ mutant colonies appear after 2 days incubation and are followed by the appearance of RecBC‐dependent adaptive revertants on days 3–7 (Cairns and Foster, 1991; Foster and Trimarchi, 1994; Harris et al., 1994, 1996; Rosenberg et al., 1994; Foster et al., 1996). The Lac− stressed cells were rescued from the plates after 4–6 days of incubation by resuspending plugs of agar and plating to form colonies on medium containing a utilizable carbon source. The Lac+ adaptive revertant colonies, and colonies of the Lac− stressed cells, and of Lac− unstressed cells were replica‐plated to assay mutations in several other genes in three replicons in the cells: a pBR322‐derived plasmid, the F′, and the bacterial chromosome. The Lac− stressed and unstressed cell colonies were grown to be at least as large as the largest Lac+ adaptive revertant colonies replicated, so that any higher frequencies of unselected mutation detected amongst Lac+ adaptive revertants could not have arisen trivially because of more cell generations during colony growth. This point is also demonstrated in experiments below.
Unselected mutations in a plasmid
Reversions of mutant tetracycline resistance genes (Tet genes) on pBR322‐based plasmids were examined. Four different plasmids were used as mutation targets. Each is identical with pBR322 except for a frameshift mutation that inactivates the Tet gene (Table I). Lac+ adaptive revertants, and Lac− unstressed and stressed cells derived from strains carrying each of the plasmids were grown into colonies and replica‐plated to rich medium containing tetracycline. The data in Table I show that two of the Tet alleles tested revert frequently enough to score in this assay, and their reversion is 10–100 or more times higher amongst Lac+ adaptive revertants than in the two Lac− control populations. The hypermutation is seen amongst adaptive Lac+ revertants but not amongst Lac− cells from the same starved cultures. This implies that a subpopulation of cells exposed to starvation on lactose experiences mutability that can affect a gene in another replicon. These data demonstrate a strong correlation between Lac+ adaptive reversion and reversion of an unselected gene.
A sample of adaptive mutation‐associated TetR mutations was mapped to the pBR322‐based plasmid, and shown not to be associated with the F′ that carries the lac genes. Plasmid DNAs prepared from 10 independent TetR isolates from the strain carrying plasmid pW17 (Table I) were transformed into a plasmid‐free female strain of E.coli, the parent of the lac frameshift‐bearing strain (Cairns and Foster, 1991), and tetracycline resistance was selected. In all cases, tetracycline resistance was transferred to the new cells (as was ampicillin resistance which is also encoded by pBR322), and the female plasmid recipients did not, coincidentally, become male (assayed by resistance to male‐specific phage R17). Thus TetR transfers with the pBR322‐derived plasmid, and the pBR322‐derived plasmid has not somehow become associated with the F′. These results indicate that a replicon other than the F′ is mutable during adaptive Lac reversion.
The TetR mutations were presumed to occur coincidentally with Lac+ reversion and not during growth of the Lac+ colonies, because simple growth of a colony from a single starved or unstarved cell (on non‐lactose carbon sources, Table I) was shown to be insufficient to generate high levels of TetR mutation. However, if the Lac+ revertants were heritably mutator, or if lactose medium provoked mutations in Lac+ revertants, then the comparison with colonies grown on other carbon sources would be insufficient. We have shown that most Lac+ adaptive revertants do not have a heritable mutator phenotype that could accelerate unselected mutation during colony growth (Longerich et al., 1995; also shown below). We can rule out the unlikely alternative possibility that growth into a colony under lactose selection conditions induces the TetR mutations, by showing that Lac+ revertants isolated, replated and grown into colonies on lactose display low Tet mutation frequencies (Table I). This strengthens the correlation between adaptive Lac+ reversion and unselected TetR mutation.
Sequence similarity to Lac adaptive mutation
To begin to assess whether the TetR mutations occur via a mechanism similar to that by which the F′‐borne lac gene reverts, we examined the sequence specificity of TetR reversions (Figure 1). Unlike growth‐dependent reversions which are heterogeneous, adaptive reversions of the lac +1 frameshift allele are nearly all −1 deletions in small mononucleotide repeats, with a strong hotspot in the 4 C repeat of the original frameshift mutation (Foster and Trimarchi, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1994). This spectrum is characteristic of DNA polymerase errors that accumulate in the absence of post‐synthesis mismatch repair (Longerich et al., 1995). In support of a similar spectrum in the TetR mutations, we note that the most active mutagenic target is a +1 frameshift allele in a run of six Gs (pW17, Table I). Two other targets, a −1 G in the same G repeat, and a +GC in a GC dinucleotide repeat, are both less active (Table I, Figure 1), in agreement with previous results regarding the sequence preference of the Lac reversion mechanism (Foster and Trimarchi, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1994). (A fourth target of unknown sequence is also active.) Second, a region spanning the +1 G Tet mutation (Figure 1) was sequenced (see Materials and methods) in 16 independent TetR reversions of the +1 frameshift Tet allele. All 16 reversions are −1 deletions in the six G repeat at position 536, the site of the original +1 frameshift mutation (Figure 1). These results indicate a mutation hotspot for −1 deletions in a six G repeat, consistent with the pattern seen in adaptive Lac reversion.
Mutations in the F′ and the bacterial chromosome
To test whether replicons other than pBR322 experience elevated unselected mutation correlated with Lac+ adaptive reversion, we screened for mutations in a non‐lac gene in the F′, codAB, and for mutations in multiple genes in the bacterial chromosome. codAB encodes cytosine deaminase and transport activities, loss of function of either of which confers resistance to 5‐fluorocytosine (5–FC) (De Haan et al., 1972; Lind et al., 1973; Neuhard and Kelln, 1996). Escherichia coli can also become 5–FC‐resistant (5‐FCR) by loss of function of the chromosomally located upp gene, which in addition confers resistance to 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) (Pierard et al., 1972; Neuhard and Kelln, 1996). We obtained high frequencies of 5‐FCR and 5‐FUR mutants associated with Lac+ adaptive reversion, but not amongst Lac− stressed and unstressed cells (Table II). The episomal and chromosomal location of the 5‐FCR and 5‐FUR mutations respectively were confirmed by transductional mapping (see Materials and methods). These results demonstrate that unselected genes on the F′ and in the bacterial chromosome are mutable in association with Lac+ adaptive reversion. The approximate equality of 5‐FUR (chromosomal) with 5‐FCR (F′‐located) mutations (Table II) indicates that the upp gene in the bacterial chromosome and the codAB locus in the F′ are similarly mutable in association with adaptive Lac+ reversion.
Mutations at multiple chromosomal locations
To generalize the finding that chromosomal loci mutate in association with Lac+ adaptive reversion, two broad, genome‐wide screens were undertaken. First, the ability to ferment the sugars xylose, maltose and fructose was assayed by replica‐plating to appropriate indicator media (Table II). All three fermentation pathways are encoded by multigenic regulons and so provide large mutation targets (Berlyn et al., 1996; Böck and Sawyers, 1996). The data in Table II show elevated mutation to Xyl− and Mal−, but not Fruc− phenotypes, amongst Lac+ adaptive revertants as compared with the two Lac− control populations. All 15 Xyl− and 14 Mal− mutations tested were verified as being located in the bacterial chromosome (see Materials and methods). Thus many, but apparently not all, chromosomal loci hypermutate in association with Lac+ adaptive reversion. Second, mutants temperature‐sensitive (Ts) for growth on minimal medium were also enhanced amongst Lac+ adaptive revertants compared with Lac− control populations (Table II). These probably carry auxotrophic Ts mutations.
Timing of unselected mutation
We wished to address directly whether the unselected mutations associated with Lac+ adaptive reversion arose coincidentally with Lac+ reversion, and not during subsequent growth of the Lac+ colony. Thus, we examined the original (master) colonies from which F′ and chromosomal unselected mutants were identified in the replica‐plating screens. The data in Table III show that most of the original 5‐FCR and 5‐FUR Lac+ colonies are pure with respect to 5‐FCR and 5‐FUR mutations, as assayed by diluting the original colonies, replating on minimal lactose medium and replica‐plating to 5‐FC medium (on which both 5‐FCR and 5‐FUR cells grow). Thirty‐nine of 53 5–FCR and seven of nine 5‐FUR mutant colonies were pure and not mixed with sensitive cells, as would have been expected if these clones became 5‐FCR and 5‐FUR during growth of the Lac+ colony. This implies that most of the unselected mutations arose coincidentally with the Lac+ adaptive reversion event, and agrees with the previous finding that most Lac+ adaptive revertants do not have a heritable mutator phenotype (Longerich et al., 1995; and below). Of the few mixed colonies obtained, most carried a few per cent of 5‐FCS and 5‐FUS cells, and some carried a small percentage of resistant cells. These probably represent independent Lac+ revertants that overlapped with the resistant colonies. Likewise, three of four fermentation‐defective colonies were shown to be pure and not mixed with fermentation‐positive cells. Therefore, the majority of unselected mutations associated with Lac reversion formed coincidentally with Lac reversion. The possibility that unselected mutations formed before Lac reversion can be excluded by their scarcity in the cultures giving rise to Lac revertants (Tables I and II, Lac− stressed and unstressed cells).
Mutants are not heritably mutator
As found previously for simple Lac+ adaptive revertants (Longerich et al., 1995), most of the Lac+ revertants with associated unselected mutations do not possess a heritable mutator phenotype (Table IV). Ten each of the TetR, 5–FCR, Xyl− and Mal− mutants, nine 5‐FUR mutants, as well as all six multiple mutants isolated (Table II) were analyzed for mutator phenotype as described previously (Longerich et al., 1995). Only six of the 55 possess a heritable mutator phenotype: two TetR, one 5‐FUR, two Mal− and one 5–FUR Xyl− Mal−.
The results presented imply the existence of a mutagenic process at work in the entire genome of a subpopulation of the cells exposed to selection. The mutagenic process that generates RecBC‐dependent, adaptive reversions is not directed preferentially to the lac genes (as had been suggested by Cairns et al., 1988; Hall, 1988; Davis, 1989; Boe, 1990; Cairns and Foster, 1991; Foster, 1993, 1994), to a region of DNA around the lac genes (as was implied in the model of Roth et al., 1996), to the F′ replicon on which the lac genes reside (as was predicted by Foster and Trimarchi, 1995; Galitski and Roth, 1995; Peters and Benson, 1995; Radicella et al., 1995; Foster et al., 1996) or to episomes in general. Multiple loci in multiple E.coli replicons, including the bacterial chromosome, are hypermutated in association with Lac+ adaptive reversion.
An alternative interpretation is that a second, correlated but different mutagenic mechanism also operates in cells that mutate adaptively. This is a more complicated hypothesis and is argued against by the similarity of the sequences of the TetR adaptive reversion‐associated mutations to Lac+ adaptive reversions (Foster and Trimarchi, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1994).
A hypermutable subpopulation
Hypermutation of unselected genes is seen amongst adaptive Lac+ revertants but not amongst Lac− cells from the same starved cultures. This implies that a subpopulation of cells exposed to starvation on lactose experiences a genome‐wide hypermutable state (Rosenberg, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1995, 1996). This state must be transient because most adaptive revertants are not heritably mutator (Longerich et al., 1995; Table IV). Such a hypermutable subpopulation could be induced by selection, stationary phase or stress (Rosenberg, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1995, 1996).
A similar conclusion, based on fewer data, was inferred for Trp+ adaptive reversion, which occurs via a different, recombination gene‐independent mechanism (Hall, 1990, 1995). Hall suggested a selection‐induced hypermutable state in which a small subpopulation of the cells experiences genome‐wide mutagenesis, but ultimately dies unless a selected (adaptive) mutation is generated (Hall, 1990). This type of model (see also Ninio, 1991; Harris et al., 1994) is supported for RecBC‐dependent Lac+ reversion by the data presented, and we have suggested previously a molecular basis of such death (Harris et al., 1994; Rosenberg 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1995, 1996). However, the data presented here do not require invoking death: Lac+ revertants represent ∼10−6 of the population (e.g. see Harris et al., 1994, 1996; also true here). If unselected mutations occurred in 10−6 Lac− starved cells they would not have been detected by our replica‐plating screen. Previous failure to detect unselected mutations in the whole population might be because the only unselected mutation target used could not detect frameshift mutations (Foster, 1993).
The size of the subpopulation that gives rise to adaptive Lac revertants can be estimated as follows. If the mutations in unselected genes occurred randomly, then the numbers of (Lac+) single, double, and triple mutants should fall within a Poisson distribution. The data for single, double, and triple mutants from a single large experiment reported in Table II conform to a Poisson distribution with a mutation rate of 0.5×10−2 per day in ∼10−5 of the whole population. The implication of being able to fit these data to a Poisson distribution is that the mutation rates for unselected genes are similar to that for lac.
Additional evolutionary implications
Subpopulations of mutant cells have been found to arise and then overtake stationary‐phase bacterial cultures (Zambrano and Kolter, 1996). These so‐called GASP mutants (growth advantage in stationary phase) appear to provide variation that allows evolution during the harsh condition of stationary phase. A hypermutable subpopulation of stationary‐phase cells such as that reported here could lead to the formation of GASP mutants. The hypermutation could be part of a developmental program for generating subpopulations with GASP ability. This idea, that the environment influences mutation rate, contrasts with the neo‐Darwinian tenet of a uniform mutation rate. However, Darwin's formulation of natural selection included this idea (Darwin, 1859).
Molecular mechanism of recombination‐dependent stationary‐phase mutation
A current list of aspects of the molecular mechanism of recombination‐dependent mutation in this system follows. (i) The process of Lac adaptive reversion includes a requirement for recombination genes of the RecBCD system (Harris et al., 1994, 1996; Foster et al., 1996). (ii) RecBCD involvement implicates double‐strand DNA breaks (DSBs) as a molecular intermediate, because RecBCD loads onto DNA only at DSBs (Taylor, 1988; Kowalczykowski et al., 1994; Myers and Stahl, 1994). (iii) The adaptive mutation sequences resemble DNA polymerase errors (Foster and Trimarchi, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1994), probably made by DNA polymerase III (Foster et al., 1995; Harris et al., 1997). (iv) The polymerase errors resemble those that accumulate in the absence of mismatch repair (Longerich et al., 1995). Mismatch repair appears to be diminished during adaptive mutation by a transient deficiency in functional MutL protein (R.S.Harris, G.Feng, K.J.Ross, R.Sidhu, C.Thulin, S.K.Szigety, M.E.Winkler and S.M.Rosenberg, submitted). (v) F‐plasmid transfer (Tra) genes are required for Rec‐dependent adaptive reversion of lac on the F′, and two non‐F′ sites tested do not produce Rec‐dependent Lac reversions (Foster and Trimarchi, 1995; Galitski and Roth, 1995; Radicella et al., 1995; R.S.Harris and S.M.Rosenberg, unpublished results). However, other loci in other replicons are hypermutable during adaptive mutagenesis (this report).
One way to assemble these pieces follows (see Rosenberg, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1995, 1996): DSBs generated in a subpopulation of the stressed cells would promote high levels of RecABCD‐mediated recombination (Harris et al., 1994). DNA synthesis associated with recombination could include polymerase errors (Harris et al., 1994) which persist as mutations due to down‐regulation of mismatch repair (Foster and Trimarchi, 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1994; Longerich et al., 1995; R.S.Harris, G.Feng, K.J.Ross, R.Sidhu, C.Thulin, S.K.Szigety, M.E.Winkler and S.M.Rosenberg, submitted).
Which DNA recombines?
The finding of unselected mutation in replicons other than the F′ bears on the question: ‘With which DNA does the double‐strand‐broken DNA recombine?’ The DNA homology used for recombination in recombination‐dependent mutation could have been either a whole or partial sister replicon (Harris et al., 1994), a gene duplication (amplification) (Harris et al., 1994) or exogenous DNA taken up into the starving cells. However, if duplications were the homology source, then unselected mutations associated with adaptive reversions might have been confined to sites in the duplicated DNA segment, i.e. next to the adaptive reversion. Thus this gene duplication hypothesis and others (Foster, 1993; Roth et al., 1996) appear less tenable in light of finding genome‐wide hypermutation.
Role of F transfer proteins
The role of F transfer proteins may be single‐strand nicking of the F transfer origin by the Tra proteins. This nick could be converted to a DSB by, for example, endonuclease activity (Rosenberg et al., 1995), by replication (Harris et al., 1994; Kuzminov, 1995; Foster et al., 1996; Rosenberg et al., 1996) or by DNA repair‐like single‐strand excision and/or synthesis up to the nick on the nicked strand. Chromosomal and pBR322‐located mutable sites could experience DSBs similarly, by two single‐strand opposite (but with neither caused by Tra; Rosenberg et al., 1995), or by other mechanisms (Harris et al., 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1996). There is evidence that different chromosomal regions are differently susceptible to DSBs (reviewed by Rosenberg et al., 1995, 1996). This could account for the existence of two sites in the bacterial chromosome that are inactive for recombination‐dependent Lac reversion (Foster and Trimarchi, 1995; Galitski and Roth, 1995; Radicella et al., 1995; R.S.Harris and S.M.Rosenberg, unpublished results), and does not exclude the possibility that other chromosomal sites will be active.
Models invoking transfer, transfer synthesis or sex as a precondition to the mutagenesis in this system predict that unselected mutation in association with Lac adaptive reversion would be confined to the F′ (Foster and Trimarchi, 1995; Galitski and Roth, 1995; Peters and Benson, 1995; Radicella et al., 1995; Rosenberg et al., 1995). This prediction appears to be inconsistent with the results reported here.
Generality of the mechanism
The discovery of genome‐wide hypermutability underlying this novel recombination‐dependent mutagenic mechanism in stressed, non‐growing cells re‐opens the possibility that this mechanism may apply more broadly. Associations between recombination and either mutations or DNA synthesis have been inferred in other systems. These include mutations associated with double‐strand break repair in yeast (Strathern et al., 1995), mutagenesis correlated with recombination, sex or both in bacteria (Demerec, 1962, 1963), yeast (Magni and von Borstel, 1962; Esposito and Bruschi, 1993), and filamentous fungi (Paszewski and Surzycki, 1964), and the association of hyper‐recombination or chromosome instability with elevated mutation in the Bloom‘s and Werner's syndromes in humans (reviewed by German, 1993; Yu et al., 1996). DNA synthesis promoted by recombination is thought to be the source of replication origin‐independent ‘inducible stable DNA replication’ (iSDR) in E.coli which has similar, but not identical, genetic requirements to Rec‐dependent Lac reversion (Asai and Kogoma, 1994a,b; Foster et al., 1996; Harris et al., 1996).
Thus, the mutagenic mechanism being elucidated in the lac system could be relevant in microbial evolution and in other organisms, during normal development and, for example, in the origin of cancer. The abundance of E.coli recombination and mutator protein homologs already implicated in such processes (Modrich, 1994; Ellis et al., 1995; Yu et al., 1996) underscores the need to understand all of the ways that these proteins promote genetic change in E.coli and in more complicated organisms whose proteins are structurally and functionally similar.
Materials and methods
Obtaining adaptive mutants, Lac− stressed and unstressed cell colonies
Lac+ adaptive revertants of the lacI–Z fusion lacI frameshift‐bearing strain were obtained after 3–7 days incubation on M9 thiamine 0.1% lactose medium (Cairns and Foster, 1991; Harris et al., 1994, 1996) (+100 μg/ml ampicillin for experiments in Table I). Day 3–7 colonies were marked on the backs of the plates and replica‐plated. Lac− stressed colonies were obtained by resuspending agar taken from between visible Lac+ adaptive mutant colonies on days 4–6, in M9 salts, and plating on LBH rifampicin plates or on M9 thiamine 0.2% glucose rifampicin plates (LBH, 1% tryptone, 0.5% NaCl, 0.5% yeast extract, 2 μg/ml thymine, pH 7, plate media solidified with 1.5% agar, rifampicin, 100 μg/ml + 100 μg/ml ampicillin for experiments in Table I) on which the lac− frameshift‐bearing cells form colonies, but the lac‐deleted scavenger cells plated with them do not. Scavenger cells consume any non‐lactose carbon sources (Cairns and Foster, 1991). Lac− unstressed colonies were grown on M9 thiamine 0.1% glycerol plates (+ 100 μg/ml ampicillin for experiments in Table I).
TetR plasmids were isolated, transformed into plasmid‐free cells and TetR selected to purify the dominant mutant plasmid from TetS parental plasmids prior to sequencing. Template DNA prepared by alkaline lysis was purified in QIAprep spin columns (Qiagen). An oligonucleotide primer complementary to the sequence ‘Primer complement’ in Figure 1 (synthesized on an ABI Model 392 Synthesizer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used for double‐stranded sequencing of DNA from the region shown (see Rosenberg et al., 1994).
Identification of unselected mutations
TetR mutants were identified on LBH + 20 μg/ml tetracycline plates. 5–FCR mutants were identified on M9 thiamine glycerol or lactose with 20 μg/ml 5‐FC. Those also 5‐FUR were identified by spotting saturated cultures derived from isolated 5‐FCR colonies onto M9 thiamine glycerol or lactose plates with 10 μg/ml 5‐FU. Mutants defective in fermentation of xylose (Xyl−), maltose (Mal−), and fructose (Fruc−) were identified as white or pink colonies on MacConkey indicator solid medium (Difco) containing 1% of these sugars and rifampicin. The Xyl− and Mal− were then confirmed on minimal xylose and maltose media. Mutants Ts for growth on minimal glycerol medium but not on rich medium, were identified by replica‐plating the two Lac− control colony populations to M9 thiamine 0.1% glycerol plates, and to rich LBH plates. Both were incubated at 37 and 43°C. Those that grow at 37 but not 43°C only on minimal medium are designated Minimal Ts, and are probably auxotrophic Ts mutants. (General Ts mutants were too few to quantify in this assay.) None is Ts for proline biosynthesis (all are ts on minimal glycerol proline plates), the only amino acid biosynthetic locus on the F′. For the Lac+ revertants, phenotypic Lac‐ts colonies (presumed lac‐ts frameshift mutants), which represent a few percent of the total, were screened for other Ts by replica‐plating to minimal lactose medium at 37 and 43°C. Those that failed to grow at 43°C were diluted serially by consecutive toothpicking in minimal lactose rifampicin agar (to purify Lac+ revertants away from non‐revertant and rifampicin‐sensitive scavenger cells; Cairns and Foster, 1991), incubated at 37°C then replica‐plated to minimal glycerol plates at 37 and 43°C. All Minimal Ts mutants isolated were confirmed by picking the original Lac+ colony, diluting and plating for single colonies on minimal lactose rifampicin at 37°C then replica‐plating to minimal glycerol at 37 and 43°C.
Mapping unselected mutations
5‐FCR and 5‐FUR mutations were mapped to the F′ and the chromosome by P1 transductional mapping. The codAB locus, whose loss of function confers 5‐FCR, is located next to lac on the F′ and is deleted from the bacterial chromosome in this strain (Cairns and Foster, 1991). Phage P1 transductional mapping demonstrated linkage of all 49 independent 5–FCR mutations tested to the lac gene. The lac− codA+ strain BW7620 (E.coli Genetic Stock Center number CGSC6813) was transduced with P1 grown on each 5‐FCR isolate, Lac+ colonies were selected and co‐transduction of 5‐FCR mutant phenotype was observed. The upp gene, whose loss of function confers both 5‐FCR and 5‐FUR, is located next to guaBA in the bacterial chromosome and is not present on the F′. P1 transductional mapping showed linkage of all 35 independent 5‐FUR mutations tested to the deletion Δ(gua‐xseA) (Vales et al., 1979). Guanosine‐proficient transductants of a Δ(gua‐xseA) strain were 5‐FUR at the expected frequency. Fifteen Xyl− and 14 Mal− mutations tested were confirmed as chromosomal by the ability of the mutants to be transduced to Xyl+ and Mal+ phenotypes with phage P1 grown on strain P90C (Cairns and Foster, 1991), the female parent of the lac frameshift‐bearing strain. P90C carries no F′ and has a chromosomal lac deletion identical to that in the frameshift‐bearing strain.
Note added in proof
A paper published after this manuscript's acceptance could seem to suggest that unselected mutation during Lac adaptive mutation is confined to the F′ [ OpenUrl]. However, as no non‐F′ sites were examined, the data are compatible with those reported here.
We thank S.Moore, K.Ross, F.Salinas, R.Sidhu and J.Yang for experimental help, R.Fuchs, R.Kelln, R.Kolodner and J.Neuhard for plasmids and strains, P.J.Hastings, F.Hutchinson, R.Kelln, K.B.Low, R.Milkman, J.Neuhard, P.Radicella and D.Sherratt for helpful discussions, and B.Bridges, J.Cairns, R.Devoret, J.Drake, B.Hall, P.J.Hastings, R.Lenski, Peg Riley, M.Winkler and E.Witkin for comments on the manuscript. Supported by the National Cancer Institute of Canada, funded by the Canadian Cancer Society, and the National Institutes of Health (USA), two Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) graduate studentships (J.T. and R.S.H.), a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada) graduate studentship, and University of Alberta Ph.D. Scholarship (J.T.), an Honorary Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Scholarship (R.S.H.) and an AHFMR postdoctoral fellowship (M.‐J.L.). S.M.R. is an Alberta Heritage Senior Medical Scholar and a Medical Research Council Scientist.
- Copyright © 1997 European Molecular Biology Organization